Every one of the claims below shows up in softener marketing, and each one reaches further than the evidence does. Setting them aside does not weaken the case for a softener in very hard water. It simply keeps the decision resting on the benefits that were measured.
A softener will clear up eczema
This is the most thoroughly tested claim of all, and the answer was no. In a British trial funded by the National Institute for Health Research, 336 children with moderate or severe eczema, all living with water at or above 200 mg/L, were randomly assigned to get a softener or to continue with usual care. After 12 weeks, nurses who did not know which homes had softeners scored the children's skin, and the two groups had improved by 20 and 22 per cent, a difference that was not statistically meaningful. The authors concluded that softeners gave no added benefit.
Parents in the softener group did report small improvements, which the researchers put down to the fact that families knew a softener had been installed. A later review of sixteen studies reached the same conclusion about treatment, while noting that children who grow up with harder water do have slightly higher odds of eczema, on evidence it rated as very low certainty. Whether softening from birth could prevent eczema is still an open question, since the only trial so far was a small pilot that was never designed to answer it. For now, the fair grade is unsupported for treatment and weak for prevention, and a skin concern belongs with your doctor.
It lowers the energy use of an electric water heater
The same study that supports the efficiency benefit for gas heaters found nothing of the kind for electric tanks. Electric heaters on hard water ran at 99.5 per cent efficiency at the start of the test and 99.5 per cent at the end, because the elements sit fully submerged and keep transferring heat even when coated. The report expects a scaled element to wear out sooner, which is a sensible expectation, but it was not measured. If your tank is electric, the efficiency argument does not apply to you.
Appliances will last years longer
It sounds like common sense, and it may even be true, but no study has measured it. Battelle ran its dishwashers and washing machines for 240 cycles over 30 days, then opened them up. The machines on very hard water had visible scale on their interior surfaces and the softened ones did not, and every machine in both groups completed the test. Visible scale after a month is evidence of scale. It is not evidence of a lifespan, so any promise of doubled appliance life earns a weak grade.
Softened water is healthier or purer
A softener swaps calcium and magnesium for sodium, and that is all it does. It does not remove bacteria, lead, or other contaminants, and Health Canada is clear that there is no health-based limit for hardness in the first place, stating that there is insufficient evidence to support a health-based value for it. Hard water is safe to drink, and softened water is not an upgrade in purity.
If cleaner drinking water is what you are after, a softener is the wrong tool, and our guide to what reverse osmosis removes and what it doesn't is a better place to start.
Every Canadian home needs one
This one is contradicted by the utilities themselves. The City of Toronto tells residents that its Lake Ontario supply contains relatively low levels of hardness minerals and that water softening systems are usually not needed, suggesting vinegar for any deposits on fixtures. Some dealer pages describe Ontario water as averaging 250 parts per million, which is roughly double what Toronto, Peel, Durham, Hamilton, and London show in their most recent published figures.
As for the promise that a softener pays for itself, the only figures behind it are modelled estimates in the industry-funded study, built on very hard water. We have left dollar amounts out of this article for that reason, since your own result would depend on your hardness, your water heater, and your household.