| British Columbia | Code floor; frost depth set locally | 1.8 m (small water systems guidance) | BC Building Code 2024, art. 9.12.2.2; BC Small Water Systems help centre | Building officials' association puts BC frost depths at 450 mm to 2.5 m |
| Vancouver | Not published | Not published | — | Confirm with the City's building and engineering departments |
| Alberta | Code floor | Set by utility | National Building Code, Alberta Edition | Screw piles need engineer design in Calgary and Edmonton |
| Calgary | 1.2 m | Not published in documents read | Checklist for Uncovered Deck Permit Application (Oct 2023) | Shallower needs an engineer-stamped design review |
| Edmonton | 1.2 m "typical", soil dependent | 2.59 m to 2.89 m at the property line | Uncovered Deck Design Guide; EPCOR Service Guidelines (May 2023) | Permit for decks higher than 600 mm |
| Saskatchewan | Code floor | Set by municipality | National Building Code as adopted | — |
| Regina | Not published on the deck permit page | 2.7 m | Water Design Standard, s. 3.10.4 (Nov 2025) | Permit for uncovered decks over 60 cm; none for fences |
| Saskatoon | Not published in the deck guide | 2.9 m at the property line | Design and Development Standards Manual, s. 7 | Decks over 1.8 m need a sealed foundation design |
| Manitoba | 1.8 m where joists are more than 600 mm above ground | Set by municipality | Office of the Fire Commissioner, Attached or Detached Decks | Applies where the province is the authority |
| Winnipeg | 1.8 m where joists are more than 1,300 mm above ground | 2.3 m to 2.75 m | Decks brochure (Oct 2025); Specification CW 2110, s. 3.10.3 | Surface pads allowed up to 1,300 mm; insulate services under 2.1 m of cover |
| Ontario | 1.2 m in clay, not less than frost depth | "Greater than the depth of frost penetration" | Building Code 2024 (O. Reg. 163/24); Ministry watermain design criteria, s. 5.2 | Transportation ministry frost maps: Design Chart 4.03 |
| Toronto | Not published; plans must show frost protection | 1.8 m (watermain cover) | Decks and Porches permit guide; Design Criteria for Sewers and Watermains (July 2026) | — |
| Ottawa | Not published | 2.4 m | Deck permit page; standard notes on engineering drawings filed with the City | Insulate where 2.4 m is not possible |
| Quebec | 1.2 m or frost penetration, whichever is greater | Not published in documents read | Construction Code, Chapter I, table 9.12.2.2 | Depth tied to the sector's freezing index |
| Montreal | 1.2 m to 1.8 m (builder practice, not a bylaw) | Not published in documents read | APCHQ technical column (Sept 2024) | 2.35 m of frost recorded downtown |
| Quebec City | About 1.5 m (builder practice) | Not published in documents read | APCHQ technical column (Sept 2024) | — |
| Nova Scotia | 1.2 m (municipal handouts) | Set by utility | Yarmouth and Cumberland deck construction details | Surface foundation only under 600 mm |
| Halifax | Not published in documents read | 1.6 m minimum, 2.0 m maximum | Halifax Water Design and Construction Specifications | 1.2 m allowed with 50 mm of insulation |
| New Brunswick, PEI, Newfoundland and Labrador | Code floor | Not published in documents read | National Building Code as adopted | Confirm with the municipal building inspector |
| Yukon, Northwest Territories, Nunavut | Not published in documents read | Not published in documents read | — | Permafrost sites need site-specific design |